Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.SO Derek Smart, personnel director of the state-owned Nuclear Electric and incidentally the company-appointed chairman of the pension trustees, thinks 'it would be tempting to use every single penny of the pension surplus to help the company's position' ('State firm siphons pension fund', 23 January). Certainly, excepting those who benefited from the removal of the National Insurance 'modification' at a cost of pounds 0.4m, Nuclear Electric ensured that none of the pounds 114m pension surplus would be used directly to help its pensioners. But the company not only has absolute power of decision regarding any actuarial pension fund surplus, it also has absolute power of amendment of the rules of the pension scheme itself.
In these circumstances, it is not surprising that the trustees feel helpless and frustrated.
Moreover, the company effectively controls the sources of information to its pensioners. It has used its in-house journal and other company publications to consistently present the company view on the pension surplus, totalling thousands of words, at the same time declining to publish at least one critical letter from a trustee. So it is not surprising that, for the majority of Nuclear Electric pensioners, your article will have been the first time they have had any inkling of the discontent of their trustees. As you say, it does bring into question the extent of the Government's commitment to defending pensioners' rights in the public sector.
It also brings into question the integrity of Nuclear Electric itself.
Aled Pugh
Nuclear Electric pensioner
Uley, Glos
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments