LETTER : Nuclear fears made real
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.INCREDULITY best describes my reaction to Geoffrey Lean's article on radioactivity ("Killer that could not be put back in the test tube", 10 March). He points out the very real dangers of radon gas which has been recognised for many years as a health risk in parts of the US, where basements are more common in houses, increasing the risk of radon contamination. Why then does he find it necessary to criticise environmentalists for their concern over nuclear energy and power plants? Does the fact that we receive doses of radiation from natural sources preclude any concern we should have about further contamination from man-made sources? He even admits that there is "the ever present fear that a nuclear accident could release vast amounts of radiation". This fear, which Mr Lean seems to dismiss, has already become a reality, the consequences of which we are still paying for - ask anyone living around Chernobyl (but make sure you wear protective clothing). Ask the children whose bodies are perversely twisted. This is not scaremongering, this is fact.
Those concerned about radiation exposure can press for counter measures against radon in houses, for reducing exposure to medical X-rays and for an end to the unacceptably high risk of nuclear energy.
Hazel Craigie
Belfast
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments