Letter: Not as green as we seem
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: The UK has been able to adopt a distinctly "holier than thou" attitude during this week's Earth Summit negotiations on climate change. We are after all one of the few OECD countries currently producing lower emissions of carbon dioxide, the main greenhouse gas, than we were in 1990 - thus fulfiling our commitments at the original Earth Summit in Rio in 1992.
Before becoming too self-congratulatory, we should reflect on how we have achieved this feat. It has been primarily achieved by switching the sources of our electricity, out of carbon-intensive coal and into more nuclear and gas-fired production. It is not a trick we can repeat again, when seeking the promised deeper cuts in emissions.
It has long been acknowledged that the simplest and most publicly acceptable means of delivering such reductions is, as the Prime Minister stressed in his statement in the Commons, to improve our energy efficiency. Which is something we have singularly failed to do during this decade. The accepted way of measuring a nation's energy efficiency is to divide the gross national product by the amount of fuel consumed each year. This gives you your energy ratio.
During the period from 1945 to 1989 the UK measured a steady 1 per cent per annum overall improvement in the ratio. In each year (bar one) the nation's energy efficiency increased. But in each one of the first three years of this decade, we managed the depressingly awful feat of actually worsening our energy ratio. Last year, again, our energy consumption went up faster than our GDP. Not, I would submit, a reason to be very cheerful. Or even particularly holier-than-thou.
ANDREW WARREN
Director
Association for the
Conservation of Energy
London N1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments