LETTER : Labour's public-private tussle
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Labour's public-private tussle
ALAN Watkins ("Labour has a splendid solution. It's Clause IV", 12 March 1995) could not have been more wrong about nationalised industries.
I have spent 30 years working in a nationalised utility and the last five years in the successor privatised business and I would not want to go back: not because I was not well paid, I was; not because the work was hard, it wasn't; and not because it lacked security, it was gilt- edged. I would not want to go back because it simply did not work as a business, nor as a service.
It was inefficient, unresponsive, grossly over-staffed, and starved of capital. As a result prices always went up, customer service was a joke, and worn out assets just got older. It is now depressing to read apparent serious commentary suggesting that we ought to go back to this dismal way of life.
The nationalisation experiment lasted 40 long years. The new system has been going for only five years in the electricity industry. Of course it is not right. Of course it needs modifying and tuning - everybody who understands the business knows that. That's what we have to do: move onwards; get better; try harder. Turning back and sulking in our caves is not the normal way of man, never has been, never will be.
Peter Randall
Maidenhead, Berkshire
THE article by Alan Watkins on Clause IV was the best I've read in 20 years of his column.
Tony Blair and the "modernisers" are wrong in attempts to remove Clause IV from the constitution of the Labour Party. It defines what the party has stood for and should stand for; not Thatcherism or Majorism with a human face but a real alternative.
J G Owen
Caerphilly, Mid Glamorgan
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments