Letter; Hump happy
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Recent correspondents have objected to the introduction of speed humps, which have succeeded in cutting collisions and reducing injuries to pedestrians. (Letters, 2 June, 9 June) The case for them is overwhelming: reducing the loss of life while encouraging more of us to walk and cycle. No alternative is available to local authorities. Until the Government introduces lower speed limits and enforces these, we can expect more.
JD Bhandari,
Speed Limit
Leigh-on-Sea, Essex
AS chairman of Cheshire social services I welcomed the Government's plans for a national inquiry into child abuse in childrens' homes - something Cheshire County Council has urged for some time.
I hope we will have the opportunity to give evidence at an early stage in the inquiry so we can highlight the good practice here which has led to successful prosecutions of people involved in child abuse. Successful prosecutions are essential if child abuse is to be stamped out - and anything which prejudices those prosecutions is to be deplored.
Much as I welcome your newspaper's desire to see paedophiles removed from contact with children, I fear your exposure ("300 victims in secret child sex scandal", 9 June) may well have quite the opposite effect.
For the cases pending around the country, including several involving Cheshire people, your article may well be considered to have reduced their chances of a fair trial and therefore result in cases that should be brought before the courts being dropped.
It is for this reason that Cheshire County Council is scrupulous in its handling of allegations of child abuse in homes outside its control around the country, in the same way as we are dealing with any allegations about our own homes.
There has been a legal requirement imposed on us by the courts that clearly states nothing must be done to identify, or possibly identify, any of the children or their alleged abusers. The court's word is good enough for us. For the sake of the children, we hope it is for you, too.
Keith Bland
Social Services Committee
Cheshire County Council
Chester
The British Association of Social Workers is extremely concerned about the child-care sex scandals you have highlighted. The Prime Minister agreed last week to a public inquiry to look not only at the Cheshire situation but at the national picture. Further steps are urgently needed.
We need much better systems of accessing criminal records to screen out the very few unsuited and even potentially dangerous social work students. In addition, children who have been or are still in care, some of whom may have been sexually abused or physically assaulted, must have access to independent advocacy.
These safeguards and others are required to restore public confidence in the vast majority of staff who do a fine job.
David Brandon
British Association of Social Workers, Cambridge
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments