Letter:How to make the buses run on time
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.David Bowen is right thatgood rigorous management can work wonders ("Taken for a ride by the number 37", 18 August). But an old management adage is that you can't control what you can't measure, which leads me to ask of London's bus service: who is doing the controlling and what are they measuring?
Since private operators are contractors receiving payment for the services they provide, I suggest that Sir George Young, the Transport Secretary, should be asked to explain who decides service levels, what contractual requirements are in place to ensure the service paid for is provided, who ensures that such requirements are met, and what penalties are exacted if the contract is not delivered.
The problem is not limited to London's bus service. Fragmentation of the train network poses similar dangers to train services. Train Operating Companies will receive payment for loss-making services (most of London's and other provincial rail services come within this category). These Tocs will have limited scope for increasing revenue to improve overall financial performance; that is why they receive a subsidy. As the franchise is on a lower, if not lowest, bidder basis, cost reductions are inevitable.
With no competition, the danger is of a gradual lowering of the quality of service as Tocs cut costs to meet their decreasing annual subsidy during the franchise period. In such an environment the effective measurement of contract conditions placed on franchised public passenger services becomes vital.
Jim Gibbons
Sanderstead, Surrey
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments