Letter: Don't blame Dorothea for her husband's sloppy scholarship
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.NEAL ASCHERSON has made a crucial misjudgement in his defence of Casaubon ('The truth about Casaubon', 20 February). The Key to All Mythologies would not have revealed Casaubon's genius, but his limitations. His research was extensive, but disorganised. This is why he is embarrassed by Brooke's inquiries about his filing system and Dorothea's offer to help him. Will Ladislaw's conversation with Dorothea in Rome reveals that Casaubon has ignored crucial work by contemporary German authors, which would make The Key out of date before it was published. Casaubon's failure to utilise the Vatican library productively was not due to Dorothea distracting him - she only offered to assist him with his work - but to his inability to distinguish between material which interested him and that which was relevant. He is more distracted by Naumann's appeal to his vanity, in requesting him to sit as a model for Aquinas, than by his young wife. His last published pamphlet was badly received, and he is eaten up by this, rather than using the criticism constructively. Finally, it is implied that, had he not been made aware of the possible imminence of his death, he would have continued collecting information indefinitely rather than formulate his notebooks and risk the judgement of other scholars by publishing.
Ella Smith
Edinburgh
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments