Letter: `Crash' is our `Frankenstein' `Crash' is our `Frankenstein' `Crash' test dummies...?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Admonishing you for publishing an extract from the screenplay of Crash, Robert Shipway (Letters, 17 November) asks: "Do you believe that `sexual arousal by car collision syndrome' is a common phenomenon...?" I can answer that I do not. Do I believe that grave robbery by scientists in order to create composite human beings was a common phenomenon 200 years ago? I do not.
What I do believe is that Frankenstein tapped a deep ambiguity about human power to interfere in organic processes; and that Crash offers a shocking metaphor for a real contemporary phenomenon, the sexualisation of technology. Crash may not prove a classic, but Ballard and Cronenberg have made fictional monsters that personify a social threat. This brings about awareness, discussion and debate which is what makes any subject "worth artistic treatment".
Janet Burroway
London W9
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments