LETTER: Blinkered A-level outlook

Elliot Vaughn
Saturday 08 April 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

SARAH HAGGER'S views (Letters, 2 April), like the A-levels she defends, seem a little narrow. Do the majority of 16-year-olds really know what they want to specialise in?

By taking the European Baccalaurat, for which one studies about 10 subjects, I was able to make a life-changing decision at the age of 18. Moreover, I was then able to apply to study on almost any degree course in the country.

Ah, but the shallowness? We used A-level textbooks for maths and physics, and in English and French we studied more texts than most A-level students. The many options meant that rarely did anyone have to study a subject they found "horrific". At the very least the philosophy course, which is compulsory for all students, would allow Ms Hagger to be more stoic in her attitude.

As well as favouring the narrowest students, the current A-level system does create illiteracy - a chemistry student who does not know Locke, or Hume, is just as blind as an English student who cannot understand Newton's influence on the 18th century, or a politics student who does not have a grasp of Einstein's theory of energy and matter.

Elliot Vaughn

Clare College, Cambridge

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in