Letter: A thousand voices don't equal the truth

Shaun Best
Saturday 16 August 1997 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Lewis Wolpert rejects the idea that science is a social construct and that knowledge reflects the culture in which it is made (Review, 10 August). I would point to the many occasions on which scientists have misunderstood the nature of reality at great human cost: Thalidomide and other drugs; risks associated with oral contraceptives, eating beef and immunisation. I would also point to an 1851 paper on "Drapetomania" by Dr Samuel Cartwright to the Louisiana Medical Association, which outlined his evidence on this medical condition which only affected Negro slaves, the main symptom of which was running away. Science reflecting the culture in which it was produced?

The postmodern world is a very uncertain place and truth claims need to be justified. There is no singular, exclusive vantage point from which to survey actuality as it really is. Wolpert's claim that the truth is a "group consensus" is not only contradictory (a group consensus is a social construct) but also relativist and does not allow for the individual isolated scientist to hold the truth. He reduces scientific justification to mob rule - there is no truth other than what scientists say it is.

Shaun Best

Hebden Bridge, West Yorkshire

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in