If we want to stop opportunists like Boris Johnson, we can’t brush the blame for the Sir Kim Darroch leak under the carpet

Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk

Sunday 14 July 2019 11:46 EDT
Comments
Boris Johnson opposes prosecution of press over Kim Darroch leak

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Reading through the latest comments surrounding the, essentially enforced, departure of Sir Kim Darroch, I find myself agreeing totally – as I always have – in the freedom of the press. However, I am also a staunch advocate of independent law-enforcement agencies who must investigate potential crimes without hindrance from, let us say, politicians or plutocrats.

Now, if this is a case of some “bounder” in the civil service attempting to make some easy money, then yes, I agree it should be published with no hindrance to the journalist.

Nevertheless, if a journalist, any journalist, was involved in a conspiracy to undermine British democracy, creating a sequence of events culminating in one their buddies gaining influence and power; this is totally unacceptable and must be robustly policed and all miscreants punished, no matter their position.

But if it is all just brushed under the carpet, then I fear we shall see far more shenanigans – and worse – from those who, quite simply, are lusting for power at any cost to this country.

Robert Boston
Kings Hill

Freedom of the press?

I am puzzled by your editorial saying that the Mail on Sunday was right to publish the private diplomatic emails written by our ambassador to the US. Public interest must never be confused with public curiosity.

I believe that the only public interest served by the disclosure is, as Patrick Cockburn points out, that for all his resources, the ambassador adds nothing to what was generally available from journalists. That was not, in my opinion, why the Mail on Sunday published them. I feel that the purpose was to make the continued appointment of the ambassador pointless. His resignation was inevitable. Boris Johnson’s failure to answer the question with “as prime minister I would always want to get all the facts on an obviously sensitive situation before expressing any opinion” merely accelerated it.

As for the opinion expressed in a letter you published recently, that the emails were disrespectful, does the writer really believe our ambassador should refrain from reporting facts to our government because they show a political leader in a poor light? It is crucially important that our ambassador finds out and reports accurately and frankly how Trump’s bellicose personality will play out in world affairs versus his pacifist tendencies and the influences on him in both directions.

Jon Hawksley
London EC1

We all knew why Trump was poking Iran already

I am not a member of MI5 or Mossad or the FSB or the CIA but I did not need another leaked diplomatic memo from Sir Kim Darroch to tell me that Trump is prepared to trigger World War Three by poking Iran to spite Obama.

Amanda Baker
Edinburgh

Pay no attention to Tory leadership promises

It is rather odd that so many people are trying to analyse the daily manifesto marketing ploys of the two pretenders to the Tory leadership.

Election manifestos are not made under oath and thus have the longevity and substance of a snowflake on a barbecue, and they are not in any way intended for the public.

The pledges focus on a group of 160,000 Conservative Party members which are made up of two key elements: Half are diehard imperialists whose grasp of economic reality is as weak as their racism and sexism is strong, and half are members of Ukip and the Brexit Party, recently and temporarily joined, and whose granite dream of Brexit is beyond reasoning or moral limitations.

Once the leadership vote is over and the winner is in place, his tune will change, and so will that of the voters.

Matt Minshall
Norfolk

Independent Minds Events: get involved in the news agenda

A challenge to Mea Culpa

I have to challenge something in John Rentoul’s Mea Culpa.

Ras al Khaimah is not an enclave of Oman; it is one of the seven members of the United Arab Emirates and lies southwest of the Musandam Peninsula, which is an enclave (or exclave?) of Oman.

“Ras” (or, more properly “ra’s”) means “head” in Arabic, both anatomically and geographically, and there are, unsurprisingly, lots on both sides of the strait, the best known on the Omani side being Ra’s Qabr al Hindi.

David Hatcher
Address supplied

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in