Doubts about donations
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Brian Tutt
Sir: Lord McAlpine ("Don't waste your time, Lord Nolan", 16 May) seeks to justify the acceptance of money from overseas donors by the Conservative Party by claiming that, as party treasurer, he applied the criteria "would money from this particular source damage us at the polls? If the answer is likely to be yes, do not touch the stuff. If the answer is no, then all should be well."
This rather misses the point. How is a donation likely to damage the party at the polls if the public is unaware of the existence of the donation, never mind of its source? Whether or not a contribution is publicly defensible is irrelevant so long as the current secrecy over the identity of all overseas donors to the Conservative Party persists.
Yours faithfully,
BRIAN TUTT
Lecturer in Politics
University of North London
London, N5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments