How not to reconcile voters on either side of the Brexit debate
Please send your letters to letters@independent.co.uk
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Dr Arthur Smith’s letter this week (“Rightfully returned”) is a perfect illustration of how not to reconcile those who voted Leave and those who voted Remain.
It’s now 11 months since the UK left the EU. Many informed commentators have pointed out issues which need to be addressed as a result – and in many cases, have not been. This is not the result of “pro-EU brainwashing”, but of a need to address practical real world issues which this government has persistently tried to sweep under the carpet.
Rather than accusing the “diehard Remain lobby” of “continuing to whinge four and a half years after the democratic vote”, Dr Smith might want to ask himself why opinion polls show that 50 per cent of the UK population now believe the 2016 vote was a mistake.
Having done so, I’d suggest that he puts his efforts into holding his own MP and this government to account to deliver on the prime minister’s extravagant claims for the future rather than being gratuitously offensive to his fellow citizens.
Paul Rex
South Warnborough
Points for consistency
Keir Starmer should gain what credit he can for consistency: in 1971 Harold Wilson imposed a three-line whip opposing entry to the EEC and now Sir Keir has imposed a three-line whip in support of a deal to leave the EU
Dr John Doherty
Stratford-upon-Avon
For publication
Now that Brexit is done will Boris release the alternative pro-Remain article he chose to remain unpublished?
Trevor Lyttleton
London
Spending priorities
The Tory party should listen to the overwhelming majority. We don’t want our taxes spent on foreign aid any more. Certainly not when our country is borrowing money. It’s an absolute disgrace.
T Sayer
Bristol
Covid-19 needs
In your report headed “Independent Sage calls for third national lockdown” you quote a government spokesperson as saying: “We have also secured 357 million doses of potential vaccines, with the Pfizer vaccine already being delivered to reduce the pressure on our frontline health and care workers as more people at greatest risk receive protection.”
The people at greatest risk and in greatest need of protection are all too obviously the frontline health and care workers, not the elderly (and I speak as one of the latter).
The elderly have demonstrated that we can self-isolate successfully, frontline health and care workers by definition cannot.
It is yet another shortsighted failure of government policy not to have insisted that the rollout of the vaccine must start with our health and care workers.
D Maughan Brown
York
Please lock down the whole of the UK now, before it is too late to save the NHS and save lives.
Brenda Quilter
Address supplied
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments