LETTERS: Under-age 'seduction' is abuse
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.MATTHEW Parris in "Scandals in the House" (Review, 29 October) perpetuates a disturbing myth in the language he uses to describe Lords Harcourt and Esher's sexual interests.
Lord Esher did not, as Parris puts it, have "a long affair" with his own son; he sexually abused him. Lord Harcourt did not "seduce" this same boy and his sister; he sexually abused them. Describing this experience as "putting her off men for life ... he was not a physically attractive man" suggests that had he been handsome her response may well have been different.
The use of language, whether describing events 60 years ago or those that are still regrettably common today, minimises the harm caused to victims and enables perpetrators to deny the seriousness of their behaviour.
Christine Weaver
Mike Campbell
Bristol
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments