Letters: Towards the first Catholic robot?

Dr Edmund Furse
Friday 25 October 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: It is good to see the Pope publicly accepting Darwin's theory of evolution (report, 25 October). However, the scientific question of the age is the nature of consciousness, and leading experts such as Daniel Dennett have argued that both consciousness and morality have emerged by genetic and cultural evolution. Dennett and several other workers in artificial intelligence and philosophy believe that there will come a time when our understanding of consciousness is such that we can build a sapient robot equivalent in powers to humans. Dennett, however, is an atheist.

I have argued in the Catholic weekly, The Tablet, and elsewhere, that in the future these intelligent robots will make moral judgements and have religious experiences. In short, some robots will be Christians, some Buddhists, some atheists etc. It will certainly be possible, at some time, for some robots to pray to God. These views are controversial, but I believe that in time they will come to be commonplace.

If the Vatican is to take a public stand against a reductionist account of the nature of consciousness it runs the risk of a new Galileo controversy, but this time the Vatican will be opposed by much of the scientific community, and the educated world at large.

Dr EDMUND FURSE

Department of Computer Studies

University of Glamorgan, Pontypridd

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in