LETTERS : The use and abuse of statistics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Malcolm Wicks, MP Sir: Your series of articles on official statistics focuses on the abuse of data by the Government. Certainly this has been profound and has led many to Disraelian scepticism about official facts and figures. But it would be foolish to imagine that all this started in 1979. Rather, statistical manipulation is endemic to government and calls for some profound and radical thinking.
Government itself needs data for smooth administration, to assess input and output. And inevitably data is used by government to present itself in the best possible light.
But the Government is also responsible - or should be - for something very different. It is the custodian, the collector and the disseminator of statistics for the wider democracy. And in this role government - any government - cannot and should not be trusted. So what do we do?
In the early days of public broadcasting it was recognised that radio, and later television, should be removed from control by government. The British Broadcasting Corporation was established.
Since then the association between the BBC and government may not have been perfect and it has been at times a bumpy journey. But the BBC is rightly cherished for its independence in a way which would not be possible if Michael Howard as Home Secretary, say, was in charge of schedules, deciding news items, forecasting the weather and writing a script for a new series of The Prisoner.
If the independence of public radio and television is vital for a democracy, so too are solid statistics, decent data. Perhaps we need an independent British Statistical Council to oversee this area, with direct responsibility for, inter alia, the Central Statistical office, the publication of Social Trends and other key documents.
Then the collection and publication of data about employment, education, health, could be done in ways which serve the widest possible audience, including Parliament, the Government and other key bodies. Statistical significance demands a correlation between integrity and independence.
Yours faithfully, MALCOLM WICKS MP for Croyden North West (Lab)
House of Commons London, SW1
21 December
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments