LETTERS: The follow-up that could be written

James N. Dawson
Friday 28 June 1996 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: In principle I dislike the idea of sequels by other hands ("Follow-ups that can't be written", 26 June). But David Lister is not quite correct in saying that "Dickens has, so far, been avoided by the sequel writers."

Sir Harry Johnston, the explorer and writer, who died in 1927, wrote sequels to Dombey and Son and Our Mutual Friend, entitled The Gay-Dombeys and The Veneerings. It is a long time since I read them; they pursue the fate of some Dickens characters and their descendants against a late Victorian background.

JAMES N DAWSON

London SE26

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in