Letters:Strong leaders or history?

Michael Steed
Saturday 26 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

TONY BARBER'S argument that the varying fortunes of post-Communist Eastern European countries shows the importance of strong leaders rather than the broader tides of history demonstrates only that his appreciation of history does not go back far enough ("It could have been different", 27 August).

All the countries he cites as having achieved democracy, pluralism and tolerance more readily lie in the northern part of Eastern Europe and were part of the European cultural and political area during the Enlightenment as Europe turned its back on the barbarities of the Inquisition and of religious wars, and prepared the ground for these more modern ideas. Four decades of Communist dictatorship could not erase this inheritance in Poland, Hungary and Czechoslovakia.

But all the countries Tony Barber cites as failing since 1989, except Croatia, suffered centuries of despotic Ottoman rule. Most of what became Romania and Yugoslavia had only a few decades to develop in a more pluralist climate before they fell victim to Communism.

The Croat exception may perhaps be due to the villainy of Franjo Tudjman. But the broader pattern is much stronger. We should be more aware of our own heritage of cruel and violent government, such as the English Tudors and how many centuries it took Europe to develop the respect for freedom and human rights we take for granted.

Michael Steed

Canterbury, Kent

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in