Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Professor N. Kurti, FRS Sir: Emily Green's and William Waldegrave's thoughtful and constructive contributions to the "veal debate" (3 January) should be read in contribution with Tom Wilkie's excellent article (10 January) based on a conversation with Professor Chris Polge, of Cambridge, one of the foremost experts in this field. It seems that, by the method outlined below, a dairy herd can be maintained without reducing milk yield or producing calves not suitable for beef.
1. For maximum milk production, a cow must calve every year.
2. On average, dairy cows must be replaced every four years, hence one quarter of the calves born must be, say, Holstein females, while the remaining three quarters should be, say, Aberdeen Angus.
3. It is now possible to separate sperm into its "male-producing" (XY) and "female-producing" (ZX) chromosome components. But the yield is too low for use in artificial insemination.
4. The answer is "in vitro" fertilisation: Holstein embryos and Aberdeen Angus embryos in a proportion of one to three to be implanted into the dairy cows.
5. The success rate at present is only about 30 per cent, but if this could be increased to 70 per cent, the method would become viable.
A couple of years ago Mr. Waldegrave, as Lord President of the Council, in charge of scientific research, offered a bottle of champagne to the author of a brief A4 explanation of the nature and the importance of the "Higgs Boson", the search for which was one of the justifications for the expenditure on the Cern particle accelerator. Now, as Secretary of State for Agriculture, he might offer a similar award to the author of a concise and convincing statement about the possibility and the cost of an early solution of the "veal crisis".
Yours faithfully, N. KURTI Department of Engineering Science University of Oxford Oxford 17 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments