LETTERS : Rates burden on village shops
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr F. E. Rogers
Sir: It is quite misleading to state, in your leading article "The dream of Gummerius" (18 October), that the Secretary of State for Environment, John Gummer, "proposes to assist small general stores and post offices with rates relief". Only an extremely small number qualify who can prove, in the face of extremely exacting criteria, that their closure would be detrimental to the local community.
The vast majority of village shops remain burdened by the vast increases in rates imposed by this government, particularly in the South, when the uniform business rate was introduced.
Yours faithfully,
F. E. Rogers
Rogers of Tisbury
Tisbury,
Wiltshire
18 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments