Letters: Putting the apostrophe in its place

David Le Fevre
Saturday 26 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

LIKE Suzi Feay, I, too, get extremely irritated by misused apostrophes.

However, since CFC is an abbreviation (which she acknowledges by writing it in upper case), it is not unreasonable to write "CFC's", since the apostrophe replaces the missing "arbon".

Similarly, when abbreviating "telephone" to "phone", it would not be unreasonable to replace the missing letters by an apostrophe, if so preferred.

It would be archaic to do, but that wouldn't make it incorrect.

The English language is an imprecise and ambiguous tool, and we should tolerate personal preferences of style.

David Le Fevre

Enfield, Middlesex

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in