LETTERS: No worse than any other agency

Catherine Simmonds
Friday 20 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Ms Catherine Simmonds Sir: As a shareholder and ex-employee of Saatchi & Saatchi I was surprised by the article in today's Life section ("Idiots and insults, ad nauseam", 17 January). The text was given added piquancy by its authorship: Lynne Wallis, who says she worked at Saatchi's in the mid-Eighties.

Indeed she did. And she was, for a time, my secretary. But my memory of Saatchi's is very different from hers. Yes, there was silly schoolboy humour and sexism and even some racism, but I am sure it was no worse than any other advertising agency of its time nor, indeed, any other hard-working hard-playing organisation. There was also great kindness and loyalty and attempts to help people make the (sometimes difficult) switch from, for example, secretary to account executive.

What was different about Saatchi's was the wonderful energy of the place, the great and effective creativity, the extraordinary sense of "we can do it better". Much of this stemmed from Maurice and Charles. I spent nine wonderful, interesting, fulfilling, fun years there.

It sounds to me as though Saatchi's didn't treat Lynne too badly: would she have got the Amnesty job without her experience there? Or might she be still "just a secretary"?

Yours faithfully, Catherine Simmonds London, W4

17 January

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in