LETTERS: Made to last
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I WOULDN'T want to quarrel with Nicholas Bagnall ("Words", 1 October) over the utilitarian philosophy of Mill or Bentham, but I think he is needlessly scornful about Utility coats.
Utility clothes were certainly cheap: prices were fixed, tax-free and subsidised; manufacturers enjoyed economies of scale through limiting designs and long runs. But "of cheapest cut" suggests shoddiness - exactly the opposite of Utility. Utility cloth, clothing, furniture and other products met tightly drawn standards.
Researching a book about Utility clothes I was amazed how many examples of Utility are still around, more than 40 years after the Utility scheme ended.
Chris Sladen
London W5
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments