LETTERS: Legal overhaul is just a smokescreen for Tory failures

Stanley Best
Saturday 30 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

IT is particularly unfortunate that the Government should, in this season of goodwill, seek to perpetuate the idea that simpler justice can be attained in the ways that it proposes; for example, by increasing the power of small claims courts to deal with claims between pounds 1,000 andpounds 3,000. Where the law and the facts in any case are the same, the task of proving that claim and of paying for the expense of witnesses is the same - whether the claim is for pounds 3,000 or pounds 3m.

It is also wrong to link libel cases and their expense with common or garden cases where the cost is less ("Tories back court overhaul to bring down cost of justice", 24 December). As a barrister engaged in less worthy cases than some recent libel actions, I can vouch for this.

Finally, the New Law Journal has reported in past weeks the comments of a professor of law from the USA who says the courts there have already tried the system of "trial management" which was advocated by Lord Woolf. But the benefits which he claims would ensue did not materialise. I am not surprised. The Government is simply creating a smokescreen to obscure the restrictions it imposes on legal aid provision - and thus on justice.

Stanley Best

Winkleigh, Devon

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in