LETTERS:Joyce's Ulysses was simply not for sale
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Bernard McGinley Sir: Though James Joyce's Ulysses was never officially banned in Ireland (Letters, 16 January), his Stephen Hero certainly was.
The earlier novel, with its contempt for Catholic religiosity, thus joined a distinguished list of banned books that made Irish censorship a global laughing-stock into the 1970s.
As for Ulysses, it was so notorious that it was often not stocked by bookshops or libraries. Its treatment recalls the remark (in the second chapter) about Ireland having the honour of never persecuting the Jews - because Ireland never let them in.
Yours faithfully, BERNARD McGINLEY London, SE5
16 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments