LETTERS: Human rights, British politicians and the European Court

Mr Simon Creighton
Monday 02 October 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Simon Creighton

Sir: The High Court ruling that Michael Howard acted unlawfully in setting the parole review of five IRA prisoners will come as no surprise to prisoners or their lawyers. Earlier this year the European Commission on Human Rights had already decided that a similar complaint by another discretionary lifer over delays of more than a year in his first parole hearing was admissible for consideration.

This judgment must be seen in the context of the Government's refusal to accept the European Court ruling on the Gibraltar killings. The European Court forced the Government to adopt its present procedures for the release of discretionary lifers some years ago, and the half-hearted manner in which this has been done highlights the reluctance to comply with these judgments. It is particularly worrying that the present government seems to find the provision of basic human rights either undesirable or unaffordable.

Mr Howard has found his policies and decisions declared unlawful on an unprecedented number of occasions. The irony of prisoners having to seek the protection of the courts from the unlawful actions of the Home Secretary is overshadowed by the serious abuses of basic rights that are revealed in such cases.

Yours faithfully,

Simon Creighton

Prisoners' Advice Service

London, NW1

29 September

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in