Letters: Formula is an offence to officers

Mr Harry Fletcher
Wednesday 02 August 1995 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Harry Fletcher

Sir: John Copas (letter, 27 July) misses the point. The mathematical formula to be used to predict the chance of re-offending was greeted with mirth, then anger, by probation officers, not because they do not understand statistics, but because it had nothing to do with their everyday practice.

The Probation Circular contains no explanation as to why square roots and maths can predict re-offending behaviour. In any event, the criteria used to draw up the formula does not address employment, training, relationships and the quality of rehabilitative work with offenders.

More seriously, if the formula was adopted as described, then sentencing would be based on the offence before the court and the risk of further re-offending. In other words, some offenders risk being jailed for offences they have not yet thought of, yet alone committed. This is totally unacceptable, as it would in effect be a form of preventive detention.

We do not question Professor Copas's professional credentials, but in practice this is another example of the Home Office attempting to de-skill probation work with offenders.

Yours sincerely,

Harry Fletcher

Assistant General Secretary

National Association of Probation Officers

London, SW11

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in