Letters: Fiction: Leavis's 'dumb judgement'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Michael Lipton
Sir: Nigel Williams, reviewing Ian MacKillop's F.R. Leavis: A Life in Criticism (Weekend, 15 July), writes of Leavis's
often extraordinarily dumb judgements about fiction, such as the absurd idea that [D.H. Lawrence's] Lady Chatterley is better than Women in Love.
In Leavis's 1976 Preface to Thoughts, Words and Creativity: Art and Thought in Lawrence, he writes of
Women in Love, which I am not alone in judging the greatest and most important of his novels. (pp. 9-10)
In his introductory chapter to Nor Shall My Sword (1973), he writes of his
refusal to lend myself to the campaign that made Lady Chatterley's Lover a fabulous best-seller, or to express anything but dismay and apprehension at the consequences. (p. 31)
On many other occasions, Leavis expressed this valuation of the two novels.
What can justify Mr Williams in writing with such confidence, and so contrary to the evidence, of Leavis's "extraordinarily dumb judgements"?
Yours sincerely,
Michael Lipton
Brighton
16 July
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments