LETTERS: Chant is a continuing tradition

Andrew Moore
Sunday 01 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Dom Andrew Moore Sir: Tony Scotland makes several assertions in his article about chant that should not go unchallenged.

Plainchant is not the special preserve of the Tridentine Rite; on the contrary, it was in consequence of the Council of Trent that the polyphony associated with Palestrina and others was established almost as normative, effectively seeing off plainchant for several centuries. It survived only in bowdlerized or corrupt form until being resuscitated by the monks of the Solesmes in the 19th century.

The plainchant that is sung by the monks of Silos, or by ourselves here in Downside Abbey every day (and in many other monastic houses), is entirely the consequence of the Solesmes revival - the "tradition" had effectively been lost. It was by a painstaking comparison of the line-notated manuscripts of the 12th-14th centuries with the neumatic manuscripts of the 9th-11th centuries that we have, only within the last 100 years, a practical and satisfying performance version, albeit one open to intense scholarly controversy, especially in regard to rhythmic structure. The dual manuscript tradition, following on a period of oral tradition in the 7th-9th centuries, when it is thought much of the plainsong repertoire was composed, is i ndicative of a fluid and changing style of church chant over many centuries.

That buying records will "restore an obsolete art form to the living liturgy of the Church" is not only fanciful but unnecessary: a visit to Downside Abbey will find this art form prayerfully alive as part of our living, and post-Conciliar liturgy.

Yours sincerely ANDREW MOORE Downside Abbey Stratton on the Fosse Somerset 30 December

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in