LETTERS:Britain's need of European rights
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Mr Shaheen Chughtai Sir: In his defence of the British legal and political system vis-a-vis the European Convention on Human Rights ("Why we must bark back at this beast," 30 January), Bruce Anderson displays both a naive admiration for the history of human rights in Britain and an unsupported faith in our government's ability to strengthen and uphold them.
There is an embarrassing abundance of human rights abuses to choose from. Legal slavery and anti-Catholic legislation until early last century, the absence of equal voting rights for women until 1928 and the lack of any law against racial discrimination until 1965 are just a few outrages that belie Mr Anderson's assertion: "We had virtually invented human rights ... and had practised them for centuries." Is there some confusion, perhaps, between the terms "human" and "rich white male Protestant" ?
The advancement of human rights has been served by the enforcement of acknowledged rights and the extension of their scope and application. To suggest that Britain alone will always instruct the world in both upholding and pioneering human rights is unsupported chauvinistic conjecture.
We, like anyone else, need the ECHR because history shows us that individuals everywhere have had their rights abused and denied. It is they, not the rights of authorities, that need protection.
Yours faithfully, SHAHEEN CHUGHTAI London, NW4
30 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments