LETTERS: Blind spot in arms protocol
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Ann Peters
Sir: I would like to correct a false impression in Christopher Bellamy's article "US cancels laser weapon that can cause blindness" (14 October). The US did not cancel its portable "Laser Countermeasure System" directly in response to the new international ban on blinding laser weapons. The US decision came a week earlier as delegations, including those from the US and the UK, crafted the protocol's language to let such anti-optical laser weapons escape any international regulation despite their potential to blind.
It is unfortunate that diplomats negotiated a far weaker protocol on a limited category of blinding laser weapons at a time when laser weapons are not widely deployed within countries' arsenals. Perhaps the US Department of Defense decision reflects a recognition that the military utility of this particular anti-optical laser weapon is overshadowed by the humanitarian impact on soldiers and society as a whole.
The new ban on blinding laser weapons also has not come into force yet. Twenty states now must consent to be bound by the ban before it becomes international law. The UK should take the lead and ratify the new protocol on blinding laser weapons without delay. It must send the clear message that deliberate blinding is an unacceptable way to wage war and must work towards removing any loopholes in the protocol.
Yours sincerely,
Ann Peters
Arms Project
Human Rights Watch
London, N1
20 October
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments