LETTERS: Air travel and roads more efficient than rail? That's just pla in loco

Bob Digby
Friday 20 January 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Bob Digby Sir: In suggesting ("Getting back on the rails"; leading article, 17 January) that "the railways ... have been managed appallingly for decades", you cast a sad reflection upon a state company that has for 15 years borne the brunt of investment and spending cuts, and for the past 40 years endured changing government whims.

It would be a shame if the great improvements brought to Inter-City travel by the High-Speed Trains, the electrification of the East and West Coast main lines, and investment in cross-country travel were ignored. The inauguration of Inter-City 125 trainsmade British Rail an internationally respected model for conventional rail management in the 1970s, ushering in as it did high-speed travel on conventional track.

It would do nobody any harm to remember that such investment took place prior to 1979, and that it is only since then that British Rail has been subject to comparison with international developments in Japan and France. That those two countries chose to rebuild a transport infrastructure with late 20th-century capital-intensive technology is a reflection of the priority of their respective governments. We, meanwhile, live with the consequences of ours. The management of British Rail cannot be held culpable for that.

Yours faithfully BOB DIGBY Kew, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in