Letter: You were warned

Paul Kelly
Monday 22 December 1997 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am surprised that any readers of your newspaper are surprised at the actions of the Government in reframing the welfare state (letters, 8, 11, 13, 17, 19 December).

Long before the May elections, it was two articles in this newspaper that prompted me to study New Labour thinking and for the first time in my life to vote Labour.

The first of these was by Tony Blair, in which he argued that the old politics of right and left was gone. The future differences (in terms of practical policies) would be of priority and emphasis.

The second was an article by Frank Field setting out his views on the welfare state and welfare reform. The telling section for me was his comment that the current system of welfare gives rationality to choices and actions by individuals which, by any sensible measure, are in fact irrational for both the individual and society.

The clinching argument was Tony Blair's speech at the launch of the final report of the Commission on Social Justice in 1994. "Beveridge's first- generation welfare was designed to pick up the pieces when things went wrong ... Second-generation welfare is about giving people a hand-up not a handout"

It was these (inter alia) that gave me the confidence that New Labour would have the strength of purpose to challenge the shibboleths of the welfare lobby and take hard decisions in the wider common interest and the best interests of those in need of state help.

The policies of the current government were well telegraphed before the election and are being consistently implemented after it. I cannot help but feel that many of those who now have a problem used their vote in May against something rather than for.

Paul Kelly

London SW19

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in