Letter: Yet another sell-off bound for the buffers

Mr Brian Wilson,Mp
Wednesday 25 May 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Christian Wolmar reports today ('Railtrack is lined up for quick pounds 3bn sell-off', 24 May) that the Government is now considering the attempted privatisation of Railtrack before the next election, This is, in fact, a most welcome interim admission of failure on its part. The idea of selling off the tracks and signalling only arises because of the Government's conspicuous lack of success in arousing investor interest in the passenger rail franchises.

However, its problem is that Railtrack is almost entirely dependent for revenue on the train operators, who in turn are reliant on political decisions about subsidy. So exactly the same argument applies against investment in Railtrack as in the passenger franchises.

The investment community understands that there is no question of an incoming Labour government accepting politically- motivated subsidy or franchise arrangements entered into by the Tories in respect of a privatised railway, or any part of it.

This is what separates the railways from all other privatisations. It is a subsidised industry, and all the more so because of the vastly inflated access charges set by Railtrack. Anyone who invests is gambling on the continuation of politically-determined subsidy, and the assistance of a compliant franchise director. These would, to say the least, be reckless assumptions.

Yours faithfully,

BRIAN WILSON

MP for Cunninghame

North (Lab)

House of Commons

London, SW1

24 May

The writer is Labour spokesman on transport.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in