Letter: Wrong time to lift broadcasting ban
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Tony Hall ('A gag that chokes freedom', 12 September) assists neither the reputation of the BBC nor the peace process by his one-eyed attack on the Northern Ireland Notice.
I remember well my indignation at the freedom that media interviews offered terrorist spokesmen to justify their atrocities before the ban was introduced in 1988. I watched many such interviews and never once saw effective interrogation.
Not only did the spokesmen seem more adept than the interviewers but also there existed the chilling thought that an interviewer who succeeded in severely embarrassing such a spokesman might face fatal reprisals. In short, interviews seemed to do the terrorists little harm while tending to damage the morale of the law-abiding majority.
Accordingly, at the time it seemed justifiable for the British government to join the Irish government in denying terrorists the 'oxygen of publicity'. The use by the broadcasting media of subtitles and voice-overs to circumvent the ban was in no way 'compelled'.
They chose to do it for their own reasons and, in my opinion, were wrong to do so. The ban will no doubt be withdrawn in due course, but it should be obvious that immediate withdrawal will not assist the fragile peace process currently under way.
The ban was part of the political furniture when the IRA ceasefire was declared, and its withdrawal in the near future is likely to be portrayed as a 'victory' for the republicans and a 'defeat' for the unionists. The Government must succeed in maintaining the confidence of Unionists if peace is to become permanent.
The removal of the Northern Ireland Notice should take place when it is least likely to cause controversy, probably at the same time that the all-party talks can begin.
Yours faithfully,
STEPHEN MULLINER
Haslemere, Surrey
12 September
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments