Letter: Wrong sort of statistics
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.IAN Jack, in considering figures for casualties in rail accidents (21 January), is quite right to describe statistics as "tricky items".
In comparing the figures for 1983 with those for 1993/4 it should be noted that the accident reporting requirements have changed. The apparent increase is more than accounted for by two additional categories: slips, trips and falls (1,559) and assaults on staff (319).
The number of casualties in accidents involving trains in fact reduced slightly (2,740 to 2,634), despite an increase in the number of passengers carried on the BR/Railtrack system (695 million to 713 million), and considerable expansion of non-BR light rail systems which are included in the statistics.
There is still no room for complacency and all parts of the rail industry continue to strive for improvements in what is an extremely safe form of travel.
Terry Worrall
Safety Directorate British Railways Board
London NW1
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments