Letter: Wrong number in Whitehall survey
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your coverage of the survey of telephone response by Whitehall departments ('Telephone calls to Whitehall offices going unanswered'; Home News, 28 January) must have spoken to a wrong number as far as the Department of Social Security headquarters is concerned.
Our QCS Call Sequencer System, which monitors the number and duration of the calls we receive, shows that during the period of the survey, the Department of Social Security Public Enquiry Office dealt with an average of 61 per cent of calls made to it. Over the seven weeks in October and November, the highest weekly score was 77 per cent and the lowest (during the 'flu epidemic) 41 per cent, considerably higher than the dubious 27.5 per cent that was claimed by the survey.
Moreover, we are dealing in Whitehall with those people calling the Department of Social Security headquarters direct. Many choose to use the Social Security Freeline service throughout the country to have their benefit queries answered.
Yours faithfully,
STEVE REARDON
Head of Information
Department of Social Security
London, SW1
28 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments