Letter: Worthy purpose of Antarctic 'hike'

Sir Ranulph Fiennes
Wednesday 27 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Your science editor ('Open Letter' to HRH Princess Anne, 15 April) says my recent Antarctic expedition was a 'tedious hike' which he suggests has no scientific or other worthy purpose. He goes on rightly to praise the science work of the British Antarctic Survey (BAS).

What a shame he misinforms your readers. My last two journeys have raised pounds 3.3m for multiple sclerosis research - is this tedious? The director of BAS wrote to approve officially the relevance and usefulness of the scientific programme which our recent Antarctic crossing completed.

Yours faithfully,

RANULPH FIENNES

Exford,

Somerset

25 April

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in