Letter: Workfare unfair to the handicapped

Colin Wheeler
Friday 22 November 1996 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: The Government intends to tell those who have been unemployed for longer than two years what work to take ("Workfare scheme will target dole cheats", 8 November), and this may include working with the elderly and the mentally handicapped. The Government's stated intention is that they will do domestic work. However, they will inevitably be drawn into caring tasks.

The last people I want working with my daughter, who is mentally handicapped and dependent on others for all her needs, are those who have to be coerced into this work, and who have no interest or aptitude for it. My daughter and all those like her need skilled, well-trained and motivated people to care for them. As it is, social services where I live in Surrey allow anybody to attend to the personal needs of vulnerable adults without any investigation into their suitability. This sort of care is of course cheap. The new scheme kills two birds with one stone. It manipulates the unemployment figures and makes the cost of looking after the most dependent less expensive.

COLIN WHEELER

Farnham, Surrey

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in