Letter: Workfare: Labour's knee-jerk response; jobs policy; family in limbo

Professor Paul Ormerod
Friday 05 February 1993 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Frank Field ('No thought for human indignity', 3 February) is absolutely right to call for the restoration of full employment. Far too many people have been bemused by the apparent rigour of orthodox economics into believing that it is no longer possible to have full employment in the West. One would have thought that the wholly incorrect ex ante predictions made by distinguished City commentators and academic economists as to the consequences of sterling's withdrawal from the ERM would have left them discredited.

All 'right-thinking' economists believe in the concept of the Non- Accelerating Inflationary Rate of Unemployment (NAIRU). This abstract construct carries great weight in policy-making circles, and is central to the arguments that full employment cannot be restored. Unemployment is determined by a range of factors, mainly on the supply side. At this level, inflation is stable, and attempts to move away from this level simply lead to inflation.

Curiously, attempts to measure the level of the NAIRU give the result that it is always close to whatever the actual level of unemployment happens to be. This in itself should be sufficient to show the emptiness of the concept.

There are numerous examples of economies moving rapidly to quite different inflation paths due to the impact of political, social and economic factors quite separate from movements in unemployment. The British economy since the war has had two major external shocks from commodity prices. In the early Fifties, the prevailing social values enabled the shock to be absorbed without any permanent increase in either inflation or unemployment. In the mid-Seventies, this was no longer the case.

In Germany in the mid-Seventies, the collective response to the increase in the price of oil was such as to place the economy on a far lower inflationary path than prevailed elsewhere in Europe. Now, as social cohesiveness in Germany disintegrates, the economy is being shocked on to a higher inflation path, despite the existence of high unemployment.

The challenge for the Nineties is to construct social and economic policies that promote social cohesion and responsibility to the community as a whole. There is such a thing as society, and recognition of the self-organising nature of society and the economy is vital to the intellectual challenge of restoring full employment. Positive feedback allows behaviour to alter and unemployment to fall without accompanying increases in inflation.

Yours faithfully,

PAUL ORMEROD

Richmond, London

3 February

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in