Letter: Women lose in Halifax vote
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: In its failure to address literature about its proposed conversion to a bank to second-named holders of joint mortgages, the Halifax Building Society is clearly discriminating against many women (letter, 22 January).
What is more, it is also proposing to exclude second-named holders of mortgage and savings accounts from its voting procedure and shares handout. The vast majority of those second-named account holders are women. So it is men who will largely benefit from the shares bonanza if it happens.
I held a Halifax joint mortgage account with my former husband. On the same day of the sale of our shared home, I took out a second Halifax mortgage in my own name. However, as the second-named person on the original mortgage I am not considered to be a continuous borrower. Had my husband bought a home with a Halifax mortgage he would be eligible for shares where I am not.
There must be thousands of women in my situation who may lose financially if the conversion goes through (whether they agree with the idea of building societies converting to banks or not). It seems extraordinary that a major institution is treating wives and partners in a way reminiscent of the 19th-century belief that women were incapable of managing their own financial and legal affairs.
SUSAN THOMAS
Abergavenny, Monmouthshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments