LETTER: Wind turbines are just inefficient

Mr Robert Woodward
Sunday 03 December 1995 19:02 EST
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

From Mr Robert Woodward

Sir: Not everyone will share David Redom's rapture at the prospect of wind turbine power stations on every hill (Letters, 27 November).

What will save our landscape from the march of the wind machine is not a consideration of beauty, however, but the hopelessly inefficient nature of the technology. Wind turbines have been around for more than a century but have rarely been seen because they are unreliable (no wind, no output), ineffective (huge machine, tiny output) and uneconomic. Today's machines have the same output in proportion to size as those of 100 years ago.

The only reason that we are now seeing a stampede to erect wind turbines is that the Government has provided a guaranteed market for wind-generated electricity at a heavily subsidised price funded by a levy on every electricity bill.

To put it in perspective, a proposed six-turbine development at Betws- yn-rhos, Clwyd, operating over a whole year would generate the power produced by Drax power station in two-and-a-half hours. Over their estimated 25 year lifespan, they would generate two-and-a-half days' output from Drax.

Yours faithfully,

Robert Woodward

Vice-chairman

Country Guardian

Twickenham,

Middlesex

28 November

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in