Letter: Why we bombed Iraq in the 1920s
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Patrick Cockburn, in his critique of the military action against Iraq (4 September), refers to the "bombing into submission" of the Iraqis in the 1920s.
At the time the country was plagued by inter-tribal raiding, which it was our duty to curb. The British Army had an impossible task: the nature of the country ensured that slow-moving columns could never come to grips with the raiders, who in any case - in the way of guerrillas of all ages - merged undetectably into the local population.
What the Royal Air Force proposed was that they could better achieve the object by air action; it would also be considerably cheaper. Events proved the proposition correct. The tactic was to warn the village headman to desist his depredations on pain of having no village to return to; warning was always given of the impending attack and casualties thereby avoided.
ARTHUR SPEAKMAN
Samlesbury, Lancashire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments