Letter: Why we benefit from single-tier local authorities - and why we don't

Professor Henry Maddick
Sunday 24 April 1994 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: Some of the assertions by the group of chief executives of district councils (letter, 21 April) have already been answered (letter, 22 April), but not their second point that there is confusion as to the provider of services.

Is this a significant problem? The 'customer', if he gets it wrong, has only to make a second telephone call; the taxpayer has a statement showing the cost of services; and the accountability of councillors in each tier is vividly set out by the political parties both before and at elections. I cannot but think that this 'confusion' is exaggerated by the citizens' responses to pavement 'examinations' by opinion pollsters. Yet it remains a major reason for reorganisation.

Unfortunately for the future of local government, the chief executives and their associations have perforce to follow the Government's short-term, dogma-driven policies. Our primary need is to build a structure with authorities based on a sense of place or on historical, sporting or cultural associations. Without roots in real communities, popular support for local government wastes away and lets the centre replace it by administration by non-accountable quangos.

Secondly - what of Europe and the 21st century? We should be looking at the need for and the potential of regions - such as Hampshire and the Isle of Wight - that can be effective in Europe, particularly through the new Committee of the Regions. In such a system, districts, towns and parishes would have a vital role to play. That system will not be attained by fighting for greater areas and populations.

Yours sincerely,

HENRY MADDICK

Romsey, Hampshire

23 April

The writer is Emeritus Professor of Local Government at the University of Birmingham.

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in