Letter: Why there's nowt so queer as folk like Peter Tatchell
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.I shall not be alone in my dismay on reading Peter Tatchell's hysterical effusions ('Do us a favour - call us queer', 26 July). He is right to point out the ills which continue to beset many homosexual people. But that he and his friends, swept along on the latest surge of transatlantic fashion, now resolve to call themselves queer rather than gay is more likely to antagonise than redress these inequities.
At a time when there is widespead concern about the transience of personal relationships, it is at best injudicious to proclaim the superiority of lifestyles that afford a wide range of sexual partners and the opportunity to be sexually adventurous.
For the first time since the Sexual Offences Act of 1967 there is a real prospect of reducing the unrealistic and cruelly discriminatory age of consent of 21 for gay men. It is therefore perversely inopportune to propagate the dubious - not to say discredited - thesis that everyone is potentially bisexual. Indeed, this very doctrine was advanced as a justification for a high age of consent and, more recently, as a vindication of Clause 28.
The most depressing revelation of Peter's article is that someone who has been so courageous in articulating the legitimate grievances of gay people can be so slow to learn the lessons of our own recent history.
J Martin Stafford
Altrincham, Cheshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments