LETTER:Why the hyperbole about Ebola virus?
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.From Ms Heather Vassall and Mr Mark English
Sir: Steve Connor ("Killer bug whose time has come", 13 May) argues his case for the world's vulnerability to infectious disease by highlighting the recent Ebola virus outbreak in Zaire. Yet, by his own account, the virus "is not easily transmitted" and "is relatively easy to contain", so why the hyperbole when many other largely curable diseases in the Third World are attracting a fraction of the publicity and concern?
Elevating a discussion of the Ebola virus into a threat from the "developing" world can only serve the purpose of endorsing a prejudiced view of African and other Third World countries. Far better we should be asking why countries such as Zaire are so impoverished that even basic medical facilities are not available to cope with a relatively rare virus.
Yours sincerely,
HEATHER VASSALL
MARK ENGLISH
London, W6
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments