Letter: Why prisons should exercise restraint

Mr Stephen Shaw
Tuesday 10 August 1993 18:02 EDT
Comments

Your support helps us to tell the story

From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.

At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.

The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.

Your support makes all the difference.

Sir: I am happy to accept the denial by the governor of Pentonville prison (letter, 9 August) that physical restraints are used on prisoners in his custody. However, far from being out-of-date, as he charges, the Prison Reform Trust figures referred to were taken from a written answer to a Parliamentary Question on 22 July 1993 and cover the previous 12 months.

Hansard reports that physical restraints - bodybelts, loose canvas jackets, handcuffs, ankle straps and leather wrist straps - were used on 194 occasions in the prison service as a whole. Pentonville is cited as using them on 18 occasions.

The table also shows that five prisons (Brixton, Feltham, Wormwood Scrubs, Full Sutton and Pentonville) used restraints more frequently than the remaining 125 prisons put together.

If the figures reported to Parliament are wrong, then they should be corrected. Indeed, if Pentonville (and the vast majority of jails) can cope perfectly well without physical restraints, this lends force to the view that their use in all prisons should be banned.

Nobody doubts the need for staff to be protected if prisoners are violent. However, if most jails can cope without relying on the bodybelt and similar instruments, what is it about the other prisons that makes them so different?

Yours faithfully,

STEPHEN SHAW

Director

Prison Reform Trust

London, N1

9 August

Join our commenting forum

Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies

Comments

Thank you for registering

Please refresh the page or navigate to another page on the site to be automatically logged inPlease refresh your browser to be logged in