Letter: Why post should go private
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: Your leading article on privatisation (29 January) is an example of the amazing lack of political philosophy in current political debate.
My criterion for what should be in or out of the state sector is simple. If it can or ought to be rationed by price, it should be privatised: if it cannot or ought not to be rationed by price, it should stay in the state sector (eg defence, police, fire, health and education). On this philosophy, there is nothing wrong with privatising the Post Office (providing it is required to deliver to any address within the UK for the same stamp).
I was once in a minority of one at a Liberal Assembly voting for the privatisation of water, and in a minority of three voting for the privatisation of electricity. I was also told in a Liberal Party Economic Affairs Panel meeting that I was in cloud-cuckoo land calling for the privatisation of British Rail.
DANE CLOUSTON
Stadhampton, Oxfordshire
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments