Letter: Why Britain should be involved in action against Serbian tyranny
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.Sir: John Turkie (letter, 2 January) misleadingly states that 'the majority of Serbs fighting the multi-ethnic Bosnian government are not Bosnian at all . . .' Comparatively few irregular forces from Serbia proper serve with Bosnian Serbs. This has been confirmed by UN and other intelligence reports.
On the other hand, it is also a well-established fact that tens of thousands of Croatian army personnel are operating in the civil war in Bosnia. To a lesser, but steadily increasing extent, imported mujahedin have joined their 'holy war' against Christian Orthodoxy.
The composition of Bosnia's collective government reflects an enduring interest in a multi-ethnic society. Nevertheless, Alija Izetbegovic, the Bosnian Muslim leader, has long insisted in his 'Islamic Declaration' (first published in 1970 and reissued in 1990) that
Islamic values and institutions must, as soon as they are morally and numerically strong enough, replace those of Western pluralism, including the federal structures and procedures of the former Yugoslavia.
Hence, it is hypocrisy to depict the Serbs as standing for extreme nationalism and the ubiquitous 'President' of Bosnia as standing for multi-culturalism. The facts are exactly the reverse. It is symbolic of this, and of Mr Turkie's failure to see the facts in their proper perspective, that Radovan Karadzic happens to be Montenegrin. This bears no significance to his status as 'leader of the Bosnian Serbs'.
Tragically, the case for multi- culturalism stood or fell with the federation of former Yugoslavia. When that was deliberately destroyed, so, too, were the prospects for power-sharing in Bosnia.
Yours faithfully,
VLADA VJESTICA
Headington, Oxfordshire
3 January
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments