Letter: Why Australians voted `no'
Your support helps us to tell the story
From reproductive rights to climate change to Big Tech, The Independent is on the ground when the story is developing. Whether it's investigating the financials of Elon Musk's pro-Trump PAC or producing our latest documentary, 'The A Word', which shines a light on the American women fighting for reproductive rights, we know how important it is to parse out the facts from the messaging.
At such a critical moment in US history, we need reporters on the ground. Your donation allows us to keep sending journalists to speak to both sides of the story.
The Independent is trusted by Americans across the entire political spectrum. And unlike many other quality news outlets, we choose not to lock Americans out of our reporting and analysis with paywalls. We believe quality journalism should be available to everyone, paid for by those who can afford it.
Your support makes all the difference.KATHY MARKS's report of the Australian referendum plumbs Murdochian depths of bias. We're told that Mrs Jones, the leader of the "no" campaign, has "heavily made-up features" and "painted on a smile" for her press conference; that the "no" campaign, with its "superficially populist message", was "stunningly cynical" and that the electorate "swallowed a lie". Malcolm Turnbull's tears are offered as proof that the result "broke Australia's heart", and we are told, as if it were fact, that "Australians with a sense of history" wanted a republic. With a final, infantile flourish, Ms Marks informs us that Australia will continue to be "ruled over" by the Queen.
We all know the Independent on Sunday favours republican government for Britain, and that "monarcho-scepticism" has always been a feature of the Independent titles. But we are entitled to expect it to be able to distinguish between news and opinion.
DAVID MILSTED
Gillingham, Dorset
Join our commenting forum
Join thought-provoking conversations, follow other Independent readers and see their replies
Comments